🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager endured losing against Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding System and Ideology

For example, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for using too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.